<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Bureau Chiefs &#187; gossip</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebureauchiefs.com/tag/gossip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebureauchiefs.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 17:05:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tomorrow, Formspring MAY be killing pandas</title>
		<link>http://thebureauchiefs.com/2010/03/tomorrow-formspring-may-be-killing-pandas/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=tomorrow-formspring-may-be-killing-pandas</link>
		<comments>http://thebureauchiefs.com/2010/03/tomorrow-formspring-may-be-killing-pandas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Lowery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Formspring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gossip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebureauchiefs.com/?p=199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Friday a news story/rumor blew up across Twitter and other social media sites claiming that the founders of Formspring.me, a popular Twitter and Facebook plugin that allowed people to ask questions of the user, had created the site not to satisfy the Internet&#8217;s vanity but to instead cull user information that would then be publicly displayed to, presumably, &#8220;teach people a lesson.&#8221; That lesson being that Web designers are dicks, we guess.
But quite a lot about the story was fishy, not least of which was that no major news ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Friday a news story/rumor blew up across Twitter and other social media sites claiming that the founders of <a href="http://www.formspring.me/" target="_blank">Formspring.me</a>, a popular Twitter and Facebook plugin that allowed people to ask questions of the user, had created the site not to satisfy the Internet&#8217;s vanity but to instead cull user information that would then be publicly displayed to, presumably, &#8220;teach people a lesson.&#8221; That lesson being that Web designers are dicks, we guess.</p>
<p>But quite a lot about the story was fishy, not least of which was that no major news outlets were reporting this explosive story. <a href="http://www.inquisitr.com/66425/formspring-to-reveal-users-private-data/" target="_blank"><em>The Inquisitr</em></a> did some basic fact-checking and figured out what was going on: that all the links seemed to lead back to one non-official source (that now redirects to <em>The Inquisitr</em>) and that though the story was claimed to be an Associated Press release, it did not adhere to AP style.</p>
<p>The story is just about over, now, though people who breathlessly passed on the rumor are now a bit more hesitant to pass on the correction. That&#8217;s human nature. What&#8217;s also human nature is what&#8217;s likely to follow: dozens of talking heads, both online and off, who will now discuss at length &#8220;what this means for the Internet&#8221; or &#8220;what this means for social media.&#8221;</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll tell you what the Formspring story means: People are gossips, information still has to be vetted, and Twitter never promised to do that for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thebureauchiefs.com/2010/03/tomorrow-formspring-may-be-killing-pandas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

